Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the asgaros-forum domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/minecraft/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Finding Ores at lower levels | Uncovery Minecraft

Finding Ores at lower levels

Posted on 2012/10/19 15:09 by uncovery

Here is an interesting image that puts up statistics on where to find ores:

15 thoughts on “Finding Ores at lower levels”

oALB on 2012/10/19 at 16:42 said:

Oooo thanks for this unc.
IceCreamJimmies on 2012/10/19 at 18:49 said:

Not accurate w/ the emeralds… even if they’re only in extreme hills biome.. the chart should have added them in. I already knew level 11 was the best for mining, yesterday I got 30 diamonds with no fortune from branch mining on lv 11
- jippiedoe on 2012/10/20 at 01:22 said:
  
  11 eye height, that is
  - IceCreamJimmies on 2012/10/20 at 03:23 said:
    
    Exactly! :D
electrofuzz6 on 2012/10/19 at 20:16 said:

Is this like per chunk or 128X128 plot?
- Daiyamondo on 2012/10/20 at 02:10 said:
  
  Per world! xD
  - uncovery on 2012/10/21 at 09:49 said:
    
    not even per world. it’s just a relative number. Take the value as a method of comparing with other ores instead of a “I can find that many diamonds”.
Xecaria on 2012/10/19 at 21:49 said:

Well looks like someone was on reddit yesterday.
- HenMeister on 2012/10/19 at 21:58 said:
  
  Hahaha, my thought as well!
  - Daiyamondo on 2012/10/20 at 02:09 said:
    
    Dohoho, me thought as sewer,!wtf can,t delete on the tab, drat!
slash14459 on 2012/10/19 at 22:47 said:

But why use this when you can use X-ray? (jk)
- ALHannibal on 2012/10/20 at 05:13 said:
  
  Banned!
patrickm129 on 2012/10/20 at 03:24 said:

Awesome! Thanks for sharing this with us! :D
Dimetrex on 2012/11/02 at 04:41 said:

I don’t quite get it. What does it mean by ‘layer’?
- Dimetrex on 2012/11/04 at 00:14 said:
  
  Never mind
  :O Quite interesting indeed! Who needs X-ray?

Comments are closed.