Finding Ores at lower levels

Posted on 2012/10/19 15:09 by uncovery

Here is an interesting image that puts up statistics on where to find ores:

15 thoughts on “Finding Ores at lower levels”

oALB on 2012/10/19 at 16:42 said:

Oooo thanks for this unc.
IceCreamJimmies on 2012/10/19 at 18:49 said:

Not accurate w/ the emeralds… even if they’re only in extreme hills biome.. the chart should have added them in. I already knew level 11 was the best for mining, yesterday I got 30 diamonds with no fortune from branch mining on lv 11
- jippiedoe on 2012/10/20 at 01:22 said:
  
  11 eye height, that is
  - IceCreamJimmies on 2012/10/20 at 03:23 said:
    
    Exactly! :D
electrofuzz6 on 2012/10/19 at 20:16 said:

Is this like per chunk or 128X128 plot?
- Daiyamondo on 2012/10/20 at 02:10 said:
  
  Per world! xD
  - uncovery on 2012/10/21 at 09:49 said:
    
    not even per world. it’s just a relative number. Take the value as a method of comparing with other ores instead of a “I can find that many diamonds”.
Xecaria on 2012/10/19 at 21:49 said:

Well looks like someone was on reddit yesterday.
- HenMeister on 2012/10/19 at 21:58 said:
  
  Hahaha, my thought as well!
  - Daiyamondo on 2012/10/20 at 02:09 said:
    
    Dohoho, me thought as sewer,!wtf can,t delete on the tab, drat!
slash14459 on 2012/10/19 at 22:47 said:

But why use this when you can use X-ray? (jk)
- ALHannibal on 2012/10/20 at 05:13 said:
  
  Banned!
patrickm129 on 2012/10/20 at 03:24 said:

Awesome! Thanks for sharing this with us! :D
Dimetrex on 2012/11/02 at 04:41 said:

I don’t quite get it. What does it mean by ‘layer’?
- Dimetrex on 2012/11/04 at 00:14 said:
  
  Never mind
  :O Quite interesting indeed! Who needs X-ray?

Comments are closed.